Indian Bar Association (IBA) is an association of lawyers who are united in the cause of bringing in transparency and accountability in Indian judiciary. The members of IBA share the common zeal of working towards maintaining the Rule of Law, in which the judiciary has a pivotal role to replay.
IBA works relentlessly in its pursuit of preserving the sanctity of justice delivery system and to achieve this, IBA is actively involved in dissemination of legal knowledge and providing guidance and support to advocates and common men in their fight for justice.At the same time, IBA keeps a strict watch on various judgments in its realm, which are likely to have an impact on society by setting judicial precedents for future cases.
The observations are shared and widely circulated in the media, to spread awareness in society and enable even a common man to decipher the supposedly complex procedures of law.
This article discusses the activities of IBA and AIM which are undertaken w.r.t. legal aspects toward various measures that were taken by Indian govt. The article is articulated under following headings:
IBA petition found that Vaccination is not mandatory as per central govt guidelines
Reported by IBA on October 23, 2021, according to the latest affidavit filed by Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare, In a new exposure of malafides of State Government, unravelled by the Central Government, it is made clear that the Central Government has never issued any directions for mandatory vaccination. However, the State Government authorities have started pressurizing and harassing teachers and the common man to take vaccines. The affidavit is filed in a Writ Petition No. 1820 of 2021 filed by teaches (Mr. Nelson Fernandes&AnrVs. State of Goa).
The relevant paras of the affidavit dated 08.10.2021 filed by the Under Secretary of Ministry of Health & Family Welfare reads thus;
“9. that the directions and guidelines released by Government of India and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, do not entail compulsory or forcible vaccination against COVID 19 disease implying that COVID-19 vaccination is completely voluntary for all citizens of India. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India has not formulated or suggested any policies for discrimination between citizens of India on the basis of their vaccination Status.
“10. That, it is duly advised, advertised, and communicated by MoHFW through various print and social media platforms that all citizens should get vaccinated, but this in no way implies that any person can be forced to be vaccinated against her/his wishes.
“11 That, as per the existing guidelines, there is no provisions for forcing any citizen to book appointment for COVID Vaccination
IBA also served notice to Dr. Samiran Panda, Scientist G & Director, ICMR-NARI, Pune for making a false and misleading statement that the person having natural immunity should take vaccine. IBA argued that studies have shown that the natural immunity is more robust and 13 times better than the fully vaccinated people. The notice added that it is clear that the vaccination is not a guarantee of protection either from Covid-19 or from death due to Covid19.
Complaint before CBI to arrest Srinath Reddy and other fraudsters at PHFI for misallotment of funds
According to a news report by IBA on October 23, 2021, Awaken India Movement (AIM) with IBA files a Complaint before CBI to arrest Srinath Reddy and other fraudsters at PHFI for misappropriation of Rs. 82 Crores of public money. CBI has already registered an FIR. Indian Bar Association demands that the PHFI’s accused trustees should be added as co-accused and to be arrested soon. The accused have misappropriated the public money and are therefore liable for offences under section 409,120(B) & 34 etc. of IPC. Indian Bar Association shall be sending representation to CBI to add all the trustees of PHFI as accused. In a Complaint given by Adv. Ashwini Upadhyay, the Intelligence Bureau has also initiated enquiry against PHFI
There is another objectionable issue of payment of high salaries of around Rs. 1 Crore to trustees which should also be investigated.
The PFHI is getting funds from tainted foundations like ‘Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The Parliamentary Committee’s 72nd enquiry report has already exposed the conspiracy of Bill Gates and their entity PATH.
Dr. Soumya Swaminathan deletes her controversial Ivermectin tweet after sent IBA legal notice
IBA celebrated it as a thumping victory after Dr. Soumya Swaminathan (from WHO) went on the back foot and deleted her controversial tweet after IBA served a legal notice upon her for her disinformation campaign against Ivermectin.
After IBA filed a petition, The High Court of Bombay at Goa has refused to stop the use of Ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19 patients. The Bombay High Court has upheld the stand of Goa Government, who submitted that the WHO Advisory against the use of Ivermectin for COVID19 is flawed. The sponsored agenda to prevent the use of Ivermectin and to put the life of citizens in danger was stopped in its tracks, due to firm stand taken by Goa Government and the Bombay High Court, said IBA.
Earlier, some of the petitioners have flagged the issue of the approval by the State of Goa of Ivermectin for its therapeutic or prophylactic uses. It is submitted that this particular medicine does not have the approval of either our DCGI or international regulatory authorities. It is submitted that in fact WHO has issued an advisory against the use of Ivermectin for COVID related treatment.”
The main Respondent i.e. State Government of Goa, in their reply, pointed out to the Court that the advisory of WHO against Ivermectin is not reliable and is flawed.
IBA has issued legal notice on May 25, 2021 to Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, the Chief Scientist at the WHO, for her tweet against the use of Ivermectin. In the said notice, IBA has exposed the malafides of Dr. Soumya Swaminathan for suppressing the authentic data of front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) and the British Ivermectin Recommendation Development Panel (BIRD).
The Indian Bar Association has warned action under section 302 etc. of the Indian Penal Code against Dr. Soumya Swaminathan & others, for murder of each person dying due to obstruction in treatment of COVID-19 patient effectively by Ivermectin. Punishment under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code is death penalty or life imprisonment.
After receiving the said notice, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan went on the back foot and deleted her tweet on Ivermectin.
The dishonesty of WHO and the act of Dr. Soumya Swaminathan deleting her contentious tweet was witnessed by netizens across the world, as the news got a wide coverage on social media. By deleting the tweet, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan has proved her malafide intentions, added IBA.
The action of IBA serving a legal notice upon Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, has garnered immense appreciation and widespread support from several netizens including doctors, activists, journalists, political leaders and media groups, IBA wrote on its website.
Moreover, the judgment of Bombay High Court at Goa dated May 28, 2021 proved to be icing on the cake for Ivermectin. While the matter came up for hearing before the Bombay High Court at Goa, the Court refused to accept the advisory of WHO. The Court has upheld the Guidelines of Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR). Ivermectin has been allowed for treatment of COVID-19.
The Health Minister of Goa has expressed their gratitude to the High Court by posting the following message on Facebook on May 28, 2021:
“We are grateful to the Hon’ble High Court for accepting Govt. of Goa’s decision to use Ivermectin for treating Covid-19.This is a crucial step taken by the Govt. of Goa on advice of our expert team of doctors with an aim to help us in reducing the infectivity rate and control surge of COVID-19 cases. Our team is working hard to ensure we are efficiently able to battle the pandemic.”
All those who were opposing the use of Ivermectin on the basis of Dr. Soumya Swaminathan’s tweet have fallen flat on their face after she deleted her tweet. However, deleting the tweet will not save Dr. Soumya Swaminathan and her associates from the criminal prosecution which is to be launched by the citizens with active support from the Indian Bar Association.
Court orders registration of FIR against six doctors after Corona scandal exposure and death of a woman
According to IBA, one woman had lost her life in a minor operation and the doctors had refused to give her dead body to her family, based on a bogus corona positive RT-PCR test. The truth unravel because her husband had already done five tests – one RAT and four RT-PCR tests and all were negative, which proved the forgery and dishonesty of the Doctors.
Upon complaint, the Court directed the police for registration of FIR under offences of conspiracy, forgery, causing death by negligence and destroying evidence. The Police Station at Panvel City has already registered an FIR against six Doctors u. sec 304-A, 465,471,120(B), 201, r/w 34 of IPC.
The court order reads like this;
Now coming to the merits of the present application, it could be seen that, a woman has lost her life over a minor operation of abortion. As the operation was conducted in the high tide of the ongoing pandemic, therefore, the concerned doctors ought to have scrupulously followed the guidelines of the ICMR regarding testing of the patients before conducting any operation.
From the allegations set forth in the present application, it could be seen that, there are about 6 reports for COVID19, out of which one is positive and the others are negative. Shockingly, the sample for these tests were taken in a short span of 3 days. Therefore, the present case appears to be case study material to find out how a person can come negative for COVID19 in just one day. The allegations that, the Gandhi hospital was not releasing the dead body on the guise of the deceased being tested positive for COVID19 and then eventually allowing postmortem to be conducted raises further suspicion. Therefore, whether these tests were really conducted or it was used as an excuse to not allow the applicant and his family to know the real cause of death is to be investigated which can be done only by the police machinery.
Further, if this allegation has any truth to it then the next thing to discern is why this route was adopted by the non applicants. Was it to hide any medical negligence that resulted in the death of the deceased Ashwini? These things can be brought before the Court which can only be done after a thorough investigation by the police machinery. Therefore, this Court is convinced that, the present application deserves directions under section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. for registering an offence under section 304A, 465, 471, 201, 120B r/w 34 of the I.P.C.
The Officer in charge of Panvel City police station is directed as per section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. to register the first information report against the non applicants for offence p.u.s. 304-A, 465, 471, 120B, 201 r/w 34 of the I.P.C. and investigate in accordance with law.”
Bombay sessions court issued notice to jail authority directing them to investigate and prosecute doctors and police officers involved in forced vaccination of victim in judicial custody.
In a Petition, vaccinated Victim has prayed for prosecution of doctor and concerned Police officer under section 336, 323, 319, 321, 307, 166, 109, 120(B) & 34 of Indian Penal Code, under Atrocities Act, section 145(2) of Maharashtra Police Act, section 51, 54, 55, 56, 58 of Disaster Management Act, 2005.
The victim belonging to Scheduled Caste Community was vaccinated against his will and without informing him of the dangerous side effects of the vaccines. He has claimed Rs. 5 Crores interim compensation. If the victim dies after vaccination then concerned doctor and other officers will also charged for murder as per section 302 of IPC.
Health Minister Mansukh Mandaviya served with the contempt notice to remove members from the decision-making board, Task Force, etc.
As per IBA website article posted on September 27, 2021, Health Minister Mansukh Mandaviya has been called upon to immediately remove the members from the decision-making board, Task Force, etc. who are associated directly or indirectly with the vaccine and pharma mafia or getting funds from black listed entities such as Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH), Bill &Melinda Gates Foundation(BMGF), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI) etc.
As per law laid down by the Supreme Court, any person sitting in a Government body and who is authorized to take a decision should not have any direct or indirect relations with the beneficiary companies.
If any decision was taken by the committee of such members then the said decision stands vitiated because of pecuniary bias. The persons spotted are:
(i) Prof. K. Shrinath Reddy,
(ii) Dr. Cherry Gagandeep Kang,
(iii) Dr. Balram Bhargava,
(iv) Shri. V.K. Paul,
(v) Dr. Soumya Swaminathan ,
(vi) Dr. Randeep Guleria,
(vii) Dr. K. Vijay Raghvan,
(viii) Dr. N.K. Arora ;
and others as mentioning in para 14 of this notice.
The notice also asked Shri. Mansukh Mandaviya to recall, withdraw, quash and set aside all recommendations, suggestions, rules, mask mandates et al. given by such disqualified members and lodge F.I.R. against the accused members who provided wrong and nonsensical recommendations for ulterior purposes of giving wrongful profits to vaccine and pharma companies and loss to 135 crore Indians.
The subject of the Notice reads thus;
To forthwith stop the contempt of law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court and follow the law and binding precedents of Constitution Bench of Hon’ble Supreme Court, and Hon’ble High Courts more particularly in the case of ;
(i) Mineral Development Ltd. Vs State (1960) 2 SCR 609.
(ii) A.K. Kraipak Vs. Union of India (1969) 2 SCC 262,
(iii) State of Punjab Vs. Davinder Pal Singh Bhullar (2011) 14 SCC 770,
(iv) Suresh PalandeVs. Govt. of Maharashtra 2015 SCC OnLineBom 6775.
AND TO FORTHWITH;
1.1 Remove the persons/bureaucrats, members of the Task Force etc. from any decision-making process related with remedies and solutions regarding COVID-19 pandemic, who are directly or indirectly connected with any entity, NGO or Board that receives funds from Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, PATH, PHFI, where sole agenda is to reap profits for the vaccine manufacturers;
1.2 Issue immediate direction as per law laid down by the Constitution Bench of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Mineral Development Ltd. Vs State (1960) 2 SCR 609,there by directing to all authorities not to follow, the illegal, unconstitutional, unscientific and nonsensical circulars and orders based on the recommendations and suggestions regarding vaccination, masks, RT-PCR test etc., issued by these disqualified members;
1.3 Issue directions for forthwith removal and withdrawl of all the false, misleading and illegal advertisements, caller tunes, Questions and Answers (FAQs) published by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare on the basis of recommendations given by members who are in the disqualified category as per law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court.
1.4 Immediate direction to protect the rights of COVID cured citizens who are safest person as their immunity is proved to be 13 times better than fully vaccinated people and the citizen who are COVID cured or having natural immunity developed due to contact with corona are entitled for relief from COVID appropriate behavior before vaccinated people.
1.5 Direction to prohibit the members of ICMR, PATH, PHFI, BMGF etc., who found prima facie guilty by the Parliamentary Committee in 72ndReport and based on the evidences given in this notice from participating any board or body dealing with the corona management.
1.6 Direct prosecution u/s 51(b) of Disaster Management Act, 2005 against all the entities and all the persons who are directly or indirectly forcing the people to take vaccines or restricting their entries on the ground of non-vaccination.
1.6 Directions to authorities to not to publish misleading advertisements, slogans and publish correct fact that vaccines are not completely safe but having many side effects and vaccines are not solution or there is no guarantee that citizens will not get COVID and the person taking vaccine may die due to corona.
1.7 Directions to authorities to issue circulars to all State Governments and Central Government entities to not to conduct RTPCR/RAT Test of asymptotic and healthy persons.
1.8 Direction to authorities to not to draw any conclusions or not to take any policy decisions of lockdown or quarantine on the basis of RTPCR/RAT Test and only use the Gold Standard test of ‘Virus Culture’ for taking any policy decisions or recommendations etc.
Alongwith the notice give directions to all authorities to issue circulars, advertisements et al to make public aware that:
(a) Natural immunity caused due to Contact with COVID-19 is more than13 times better than the person fully vaccinated and such people are most safest persons. They will not get corona again and they cannot spread infection.
(b) Wearing mask is voluntary and there is no scientific proof that masks can prevent infection. And the healthy or asymptomatic people need not to wear mask. Also publish the scientific studies regarding damage caused to the lungs and also other side effects of wearing masks.
(c) Give wide publicity and proper support to the following result oriented remedies and treatments which are having far more efficacy than vaccines and not having no side effects with zero deaths as compared with many side effects and deaths due to vaccines:-
i) Naturopathy’s – Three step Fluid Diet as formulated by Dr. Biswaroop Roy Choudhary and verified by National Institute of Naturopathy, Pune.
ii) ‘K’ medicine as verified & approved by the State Government of Andhra Pradesh and confirmed by the Hon’ble Andhra Pradesh High Court.
iii) Ayurvedic & yoga treatment as suggested by Baba Ramdev.
The point wise frauds and issues with proofs exposed by the sender of Notice are as under;
2.1. Duty of every citizen under Article 51 (a) of the Constitution of India.
2.2. ICMR survey exposed the non-efficacy of vaccines and also falsity of Health Ministry’s claim.
2.3. Any person including Ministers, who are receiving salary is public servant and he is bound to act fairly, impartially and only for the welfare of the nation. Any deviation and misappropriation of public funds by misuse of power is punishable under Section 409 of IPC having punishment up to life imprisonment.
2.4. Law of disqualification of any person from taking part in process, who is interested in someone’s profit and their agenda.
2.5. Even if there is a single member who is partial and interested and there are other members who are impartial then also it vitiates and invalidate their recommendations, suggestions and all actions.
2.6. Failure to follow the law of disqualification and taking interested person makes such authority and Ministers liable for action under section 166, 218, 219,511, 120 (B) & 34 etc. of IPC and contempt of Supreme Court and various High Courts in India.
2.7. The Person/Minister joining the unlawful acts subsequently is also liable for same offences as that of principal offender.
2.8. Proofs exposing links of members of National Task Force with vaccine mafia Bill Gates and Others.
2.9. Conflicts of Interest and also criminal conspiracy in India’s Public Health System.
2.10. Unlawful & unconstitutional partnership or collaboration with LLP or any private entity like PHFI, PATH et al.
2.11. As per Supreme Court judgment the honest members of body or Task Force who opposed the wrong, illogical and irrational decisions of the Task Force should not be prosecuted. But the members who did not opposed the unlawful activities should be arrested and don’t deserve bail.
2.12. Misuse and fraud on power by corrupt, intellectually dishonest members of task force in giving recommendations, suggestion and in formulating rules which will cause wrongful gain to vaccine companies and having dangerous impact of various losses to citizen including loss of life and life time disabilities, loss of business and livelihood.
2.13. Dishonesty and fraud in bringing mask mandate.
2.14. Fraud and dishonest decisions of RT-PCR Test of asymptomatic persons.
2.15. Intentionally & deliberately suppressing the result of Sero survey which proved that around 70% of Indians have got natural immunity due to contact with Covid Sars-2 and they are the safest person and they cannot be asked to follow restrictions or to take vaccines because the immunity developed due to contact with corona (Covid-19) is more than 13 times better than the immunity developed due to vaccines.
2.16. Fraudulently, corruptly & malafidely running the false narratives and conspiracy theories of asymptomatic patients without any scientific data and proofs.
2.17. Study and reasoning on dangerous viruses found in healthy people.
2.18. Conspiracy and fraud to suppress the economical and highly effective medicines and remedies such as Ivermectin, Vitamin-D, Hydroxychloroquine, Naturopathy, Ayurveda et al. to show that there is no remedy and medicines to cure corona and this was done to serve their ulterior purposes of getting emergency use authorization (EUA) to the vaccines whose clinical trials are not completed and there were no proofs of its efficacy and its side effects were not studied properly as mandated in medical science.
2.19. Attempt to violate fundamental rights of citizens by forcing them to take vaccines and committing offences under section 323, 336, 115, 302, 304 etc., of I.P.C.
2.20. Misappropriation of around thousands of crores on vaccines and RTPCR tests.
2.21. Conspiracy to bring vaccine mandate for children’s to give wrongful profit of thousands of crores to vaccine companies.
2.22. All the report and recommendation of the ICMR and other bodies cannot be the basis for any conclusion or recommendations because they are based on the result of test of RT-PCR at 35 Cycle Threshold (CT) which is having false positive rate of 97%. Therefore, any recommendation about efficacy of vaccines or lockdown or anything is not permissible on the basis of the results of RT-PCR Test.
2.23. Parliamentary Committee’s 72nd report exposing corruption by ICMR and other officials involved in conspiracy to help vaccine syndicate sponsored by Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and also responsible for offences of murder of female children. Supreme Court judgment upholds the evidentiary value of Parliamentary Committee Report.
2.24. Recommendation of the Parliamentary Committee asking for investigation and legal action against Bill Gates and officials of ICMR.
2.25. [a] Earlier attempt by accused WHO official to declare false pandemic:
[b] The H1N1 swine flu pandemic was “fake,” and its threat to human health was hyped, and that World Health Organisation’s (WHO) policies were influenced by vaccine manufacturers who benefited from the pandemic virus. Swine flu, Bird flu ‘never happened’: Probe into H1N1 ‘false pandemic’.
2.26. Fake Epidemics Created in the Past due to RT-PCR Misuse.
2.27. [A] National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization (NTAGI) recommendations vitiated in view of law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in A. K. Kraipak’s case (supra) because of having disqualified members.
[B] Dishonesty and falsity in NTAGI’s declaration on conflict of interest.
2.28. Direction for enquiry as to under what provision of law the government had given a funding of Rs. 100 crores to PHFI and enquiry as to where and how the said funds were utilized.
2.29. Deliberate attempt to suppress the most effective Three Step Fluid Diet given by world’s renowned naturopath Dr. Biswaroop Roy Chaudhary which is verified by Government of India’s AYUSH Ministry’s National Institute of Naturopathy Pune and having far better result than vaccines and having no side effects and Zero deaths.
2.30. Co- Conspirator, Social & main stream media’s role to help the accused to complete their sinister plan.
2.31. In addition to above said offences, the accused ‘print and social media’ persons stopping, prohibiting or deleting the information are also liable for punishment under section 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 r/w Article 129 and 215 of Constitution of India for acting in willful disregard and defiance of binding precedent of Hon’ble Supreme Court and various High Courts in India.
2.32. Act of stopping, hiding, removing, suppressing, concealing and twisting material facts from any patient/citizen and leaving him no option but to adopt the option of dangerous vaccines is a preparation of offence mass murder of the people at large as defined under section 115, 511 of IPC.
2.33. Chronology of offences committed by accused as per their conspiracy to commit mass murders i.e. genocide for creating market for unapproved vaccines by accused Bill And Melinda Gates Foundation and other vaccine syndicates.
Legal notice for contempt of court against Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan and the Directorate General Of Health Services (DGHS) to undermine the authority of the Bombay High Court and obstruct the use of Ivermectin for Covid-19 treatment
On 13th June 2021, Indian Bar Association has served a notice upon Dr.Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director General, World Health Organisation, Dr.Soumya Swaminathan, the Chief Scientist at WHO and Prof. (Dr.) Sunil Kumar, Director General of Health Services for contempt of judgment of Bombay High Court MENTIONED ABOVE.
The Bombay High Court vide its judgment dated 28th May 2021 has already given a green signal for use of Ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19. Despite this, all the three contemnors have hatched a conspiracy and by spreading misinformation through media, are fuelling confusion amongst doctors by introducing Guidelines allegedly published on 27th May 2021 by DGHS, which are in fact not mandatory and are overruled by the judgment of Bombay High Court dated 28thMay 2021.
Thereafter, a detailed and impactful article was published by the leading newspaper ‘Free Press Journal’ on 6th June 2021 (updated on 14th June 2021) wherein the author has articulated very well as to how the advisories of WHO are dubious. https://www.freepressjournal.in/india/covid-19-are-whos-directives-being-taken-seriously-on-the-ground
Surprisingly, in its first, the Directorate of Health Services (DGHS) on 27th May, 2021 announced ‘Comprehensive Guidelines for Management of COVID-19 patients’ which excludes Ivermectin and several popular drugs. It is worthwhile to note that DGHS is a repository of technical knowledge and is an attached organization of the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. The Guidelines/National Protocol have always been issued by the Joint Task Force of All India Institute of Medical Science (AIIMS) and Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR) under the aegis of Government of India.
Moreover, the document containing these impugned Guidelines does mention version/date and does not carry logos of Government of India, ICMR and AIIMS, suggesting lack of consensus between DGHS and the Joint Task Force.
Now, in order to diminish the impact of the article published on 6th June, 2021, the main accused Dr. Soumya Swaminathan hatched a conspiracy and managed some media houses to publish news on 7th June, 2021 for appreciating the overruled guidelines dated 27th May, 2021. Some of these media houses have showed astounding alacrity in publishing news hailing removal of Ivermectin and other drugs, thereby deliberately ignoring the mountains of clinical data on effectiveness of Ivermectin in treatment of COVID-19.
These impugned Guidelines issued by DGHS were circulated first on 7th June 2021, without any mention of the judgment of Bombay High Court dated 28thMay, 2021, which in fact is against the said guidelines, rendering these guidelines as null and void.
As per the judgment of Supreme Court of India, the person responsible for spreading information with object of creating confusion and to obstruct and undermine the judgment of court is liable for punishment under contempt of Court. Sections like 505,192,302, 115,109,409,120(B) of the Indian Penal Code are also attracted against the accused in this case, as their intention was to kill several people to fulfil their ulterior purposes. The maximum punishment in above cases is death penalty.
The notice states that Dr. Soumya Swaminathan and the WHO are dishonest and have no scientific evidences to back their advisories and such loose statements are issued from time to time, to serve their ulterior purposes.
The legal notice also explains the law of damages in India citing recently cases where Court had ordered compensation of Rs. 100 Crores ((USD 13.5 mn) to the aggrieved party, for loss of his reputation. Since the present matter involves death caused due to denial of early treatment resulting in deterioration and death of person, the damages claimed would be much higher that Rs. 100 Crores.
The notice also explains the liability of Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director General of WHO, for his act of commission and omission and also for his implied consent to the conspiracy. In the similar manner, the DGHS Prof. (Dr.) Sunil Kumar is joined in as co-accused for his complicity in the conspiracy.
“As a generic, Ivermectin is cheap and widely available, which means there would be a lot less money to be made by Big Pharma if it became the go-to early-stage treatment against COVID.
Other pharmaceutical companies are developing their own novel treatments for COVID-19 which would have to compete directly with Ivermectin. If approved as a COVID-19 treatment, Ivermectin could even threaten the Emergency Use Authorization granted to COVID-19 vaccines.
It’s worth noting that while India’s DGHS has dumped most cheap off-patent treatment options against COVID, including even multivitamins, more expensive patented medicines continue to get the green light. They include Gilead’s prohibitively expensive antiviral Remdesivir, which DGHS continues to recommend for “select moderate/ severe hospitalized COVID-19 patients”, even though “it is only an experimental drug with potential to harm.” It has also authorized the use of the anti-inflammatory medicine to Cilizumab, which costs hundreds of dollars a dose.”
The three possible explanations for such an intense opposition to the use of highly promising, well-tolerated off-label medicine as Ivermectin are explained very well in following article: WHO Celebrates As Indian Health Regulator Removes Ivermectin from Its Covid-19 Protocol | naked capitalism (https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2021/06/indias-health-ministry-just-removed-ivermectin-from-its-covid-19-protocol-no-questions-asked-no-explanations-given.html)
Youtube & Google slapped with Rs. 1000 crores compensation and contempt notice, for acting against the law and the constitution in order to help the vaccine syndicate.
The present notice sent by Adv. Abhishek Mishra renowned Social Activist and Awaken India Movement’s member Shri. Virendra Singh says that the act of YouTube is not only against the Constitution of India and binding judgment of Supreme Court and High Court but also against the United Nation’s Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights, 2005 and International Covenant on Civil & Political Rights.
YouTube has deleted videos of many researchers, doctors, activists and citizens which were regarding the frauds, malpractices and illegalities by the vaccine syndicate. Also, the videos were regarding awareness of public about the fatal side effects.
Recently German High Court fined YouTube with 1,00,000 Euros. In another case of misinformation campaign, the U.S. Court recorded the guilt of Glaxo Smith Kline where the company agreed to pay $ 3 Billion (around Rs. 2278 Crore).
YouTube and Google are said to have joined the conspiracy to remove the information exposing malpractices of vaccine syndicate and additionally running a misinformation campaign to promote the vaccine as safe and the ‘only solution’ to cure COVID-19 infection.
That, YouTube involved in a conspiracy to suppress the data and run only one false narrative that vaccines are safe and only solution.
In furtherance of the said sinister plan, YouTube at their own have uploaded many videos of several ‘captured’ doctors to spread misinformation that ‘vaccines are completely safe and the only available complete solution against the Covid-19.
Falsity of its advertisements, interviews, false narratives and conspiracy theories have been exposed from the following;
(i) Vaccine is not a solution against corona since people who are getting two doses of vaccine are also infected with corona and some of them have died. (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gFR9YyJnjxTu3-Q-D2uG-PmF7uAG4cDp/view?usp=sharing,
(ii) Vaccines are not safe at all and vaccines are having several side effects including death.
(iii) The immunity developed in the person due to his/her coming in contact of SARS-CoV-2 i.e. Natural immunity is far superior to the vaccines. It is at least 13 times superior to the immunity developed due to vaccines. (https://youtu.be/6v5VrpgXPm4)
However, YouTube runs unilateral and false narrative and have always tried its level best to suppress and conceal the true information from common people. This is in fact an offence of luring the people to take medicine by misrepresenting the public at large. It is an offence punishable under section 420 r/w 120(B) & 340 of I.P.C.
Citing the judgement, IBA wrote, that Hon’ble Meghalaya High Court in Registrar General, High Court of Meghalaya Vs. State of Meghalaya 2021 SCC OnLineMegh 130, ruled by High Court as under;
“Thus, by use of force or through deception if an unwilling capable adult is made to have the „flu vaccine would be considered both a crime and tort or civil‟ wrong.”
In the notice sent by Social Activist Virendra Singh the YouTube, Google are called upon to;
That the offences committed by You Noticee are continuing ones and my client’s defamation is still going on. Hence, you are hereby called upon to;
(i) Publish an apology on Facebook / Youtube / Twitter.
(ii) Pay my client a compensation f Rs. 1000 Crores for defamation through Demand Draft(DD) within 7 days of receipt of this notice.
(iii) Remove restriction and restore the videos forthwith.
(iv) Immediately stopping the misinformation campaign run by you with ulterior motives to help the vaccine mafias and cheat the public and thereby putting citizens’ life into jeopardy.
(v) Immediately stopping the Contempt of Hon’ble Supreme Court and Hon’ble various High Courts in India.
(vi) To immediately start respecting & following the Constitution of India and our country’s domestic laws and also to act as per United Nations Universal Declaration on Bioethics, 2005 & International Covenant on Civil & Political Rights.
The notice also states that, the notice is independent of and given by reserving the issuer’s rights to initiate criminal prosecutions under sec. 499, 500, 501, r/w 120(B), 34 etc. of Indian Penal Code and under Section 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 r/w Article 129, 215 of the Constitution of India in the competent courts and even if YouTube pays compensation amount of Rs. 1,000 Crores will not permit them in law, for claiming discharge or exoneration from prosecution.
Legal notice served upon facebook claiming compensation of Rs. 500 crores for its act of deleting the posts regarding adverse effects of corona vaccines
In September 2021, the notice was issued by Adv. Tanveer Nizam to facebook on behalf of renowned Activist and Naturopath Smt. Nisha Koiri mentions that the deleted posts were based on correct facts and as a part of his client’s duty under article 51 A of the Constitution of India. Therefore, deleting the post is violative of Article 14,19 and 21 of the Constitution of India.
As per the Constitution of India and as per specific laws laid down by the Supreme Court and Delhi High Court, every Indian has freedom of speech and expression. The citizens also have the fundamental rights to know the correct information. As per article 18 of the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights 2005 and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) the discussion and opinions from all parts of the society need to be welcomed and promoted.
The said article reads thus;
Article 18 – Decision-making and addressing bioethical issues
Professionalism, honesty, integrity and transparency in decision-making should be promoted, in particular declarations of all conflicts of interest and appropriate sharing of knowledge. Every endeavor should be made to use the best available scientific knowledge and methodology in addressing and periodically reviewing bioethical issues.
Persons and professionals concerned and society as a whole should be engaged in dialogue on a regular basis.
Opportunities for informed pluralistic public debate, seeking the expression of all relevant opinions, should be promoted.
Article 19 of the ICCPR Convention reads as follows:
(1) Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference;
(2) Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression, this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art or through any other media of his choice.”
India has ratified the ICCPR. Section 2(d) read with 2(f) of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 clarifies ‘human rights’ to include the rights guaranteed by the ICCPR.
Supreme Court of India had time and now ruled that freedom of expression is meant to include the right of all citizens to speak, publish and express their views. The freedom of the press embodies the right of the people to read.
Noncompliance with the law laid down by the Supreme Court makes the Facebook head Mark Zuckerberg and other office bearers of the Facebook liable for action under the Contempt of Courts Act where the punishment is up to six months imprisonment.
Deleting a post without lawful reason amounts to defamation as per Indian laws and it is punishable under section 500, 501 of Indian Penal Code where punishment is two years imprisonment.
The Facebook cannot act like a Judge of a Court and decide as to whose information is correct or wrong. The act of running only one narratives in favor of vaccines and compelling citizens to take these vaccines, also makes the Facebook liable to face the charges of attempt to commit murder, if the side effects of vaccines are suppressed and if the person is compelled to take vaccines by suppressing data to mislead the said person and if the said person dies due to side effects of vaccines, then Mark Zuckerberg and other office bearers of the Facebook are liable for action under sections 302, 115, 52, 120(B), 34 of Indian Penal Code and they may face the death penalty for mass murders and genocide.
Recently, in a case against YouTube, the German Higher Regional Court fined YouTube with 1,00,000 Euros after it wrongly deleted a user’s video which showed massive pandemic lockdown protests in Switzerland – and then failed to reinstate the video ‘immediately’ after the court ordered it to do so.
Meanwhile, a so-called independent fact-checker website FactCheck.org was exposed to be funded by the same $1.9 billion vaccine lobby group that it is supposed to check. The site is a Facebook partner whose articles are used to censor critical voices on the social media platform. It is headed by the former CDC director, which is again a conflict of interest.
In a shocking revelation came to light that Google and USAID funded research conducted by Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance – a controversial group which has openly collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology on “killer” bat coronavirus research – for over a decade. In a move against this Big Tech censorship of free speech, Poland is planning to make censoring of social media accounts illegal.
Letter of Representation to PM toward Urgent need to rectify the utter disregard for science regarding children’s corona vaccines
Indian Bar Association (IBA) has also sought prosecution of Dr. V.G. Somani, Dr.Randeep Guleria and others for misuse of their position to create a false alarm of emergency in children, while there is no emergency.
‘Doctors for Truth’ and Concerned Citizens of India have written to Hon’ble Prime Minister of India on October 7, 2021 regarding urgent need to rectify the utter disregard for Science while deciding corona related measures that have special worrying effects on children.
IBA has sent its Letter of Representation on October 8, 2021 endorsing the concerns expressed in above mentioned letter and in addition, IBA has called for CBI investigation against Dr. V.G. Somani, Randeep Guleria and others for misuse and fraud on power.
More than 100 doctors and more than 1000 members of civil society have signed a letter sent to Hon’ble Prime Minister of India on October 7, 2021 exhorting not to go ahead with vaccination of children as they have already developed immunity and are at no risk of severe Covid. The letter highlights that :
The corona vaccines are not fully approved (approved for restricted use only) without any knowledge of long-term effects.
Experts have confirmed that letting children catch Covid may be safer than giving them vaccines, our children have already acquired immunity post Covid infection and on the other hand, these experimental vaccines wherever they are rolled out, are not found to be safe enough.
Worldwide a cascade of serious Adverse Effects have been seen in adults and children in 2021 after the ‘Emergency Use Authorisation’ was granted for restricted use of Covid-19 vaccines.
As per a German Court verdict, that masks, distancing and regular testing of children for Covid-19 should not be done. These measures are not only not useful but are actually harmful.
The signatories of the letter demand that:
All Covid-19 vaccine clinical trials on children should be stopped.
The Covid-19 vaccination for children should not be rolled out even if vaccines are given EUA for restricted use, and no vaccines, currently under trial, to be given EUA.
Immediate reopening of schools and colleges without any delay or restrictions as advised by experts.
No testing of asymptomatic children at school or home.
No experimental and unapproved drugs should be used in the treatment of children who test positive and/or have Influenza Like Illness (ILI) rather children should be subject to standard of care using proven, tested and repurposed drugs and Ayush protocols under an Integrated Medicine Healthcare approach. It is our experience that experimental drugs have proved harmful for adults in the 1st and 2nd wave.
No testing, tracing, quarantine at mass level either routinely or as part of job, earning activity, entry to certain places or for travel as has been scientifically advised once community transmission has set in.
Indian Bar Association (IBA) has sent its Letter of Representation on October 8, 2021 to Hon’ble Prime Minister, Hon’ble Home Minister, Hon’ble Health Minister, Hon’ble Chief Ministers Hon’ble Health Ministers of all the states of India.
While IBA is in full agreement with the facts shared in the letter by Doctors for Truth and Civil Society, it has called for:
Immediate direction to C.B.I. for investigation and prosecution under Section 409, 420, 115, 109, 323, 511, 120(B) etc. of Indian Penal Code and provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act against Dr. Randeep Guleria, and others for misuse and fraud on power in:
i) Giving Emergency Use Authorization for Children’s Vaccines, when there is no emergency as there is no serious threat to children;
ii) Running false narratives and conspiracy theories to create fear in the mind of parents, children and teachers about Covid-19, when children are most safe and not having any serious risk from infection from SARS-CoV-2.
iii) Immediately directing investigation about corruption being done to give undeserving advantage of around Rs. 80,000 Crores to children’s Vaccine manufacturers.
iv) Immediate direction for stopping any process for including children’s corona vaccines in National Immunization Programme.
Note: The article is compilation of news reported on website of IBA i.e. https://indianbarassociation.in/covid-19/. The author and Biotech Express takes no responsibility for any error in the article. For cross verification and more detailed news readers are suggested to visit IBA website.